Corrosion in condensate cargo tanks on an FSO

Corrosion in condensate cargo tanks on an FSO (Floating Storage and Offloading unit) is a persistent and high-risk issue, especially because condensate is more chemically aggressive than typical crude. Let’s break it down clearly and then look at how SPS cold work addresses it without shutting everything down.

Why corrosion happens in condensate cargo tanks

Condensate cargo creates a particularly harsh environment due to:

  1. High volatility and dissolved gases
    Condensate often contains CO₂ and sometimes H₂S, which form acids when mixed with water → internal corrosion accelerates.

  2. Water bottoms and phase separation
    Even small amounts of water settle at the tank bottom, creating localized corrosion zones (pitting, MIC-microbiologically influenced corrosion).

  3. Coating degradation
    Over time, tank coatings fail due to:
    • Thermal cycling
    • Chemical attack
    • Mechanical abrasion during loading/unloading

       Once coatings fail, steel is directly exposed.

  1. Sloshing and structural stress
    FSOs experience constant motion, which:
    • Cracks coatings
    • Exposes fresh steel surfaces
    • Accelerates fatigue + corrosion interaction

  1. Limited access for maintenance
    Cargo tanks are confined spaces with:
    • Hazardous atmospheres
    • Operational constraints
    • Strict safety rules (especially around hot work)

       

Below picture showing location of internal spot corrosions typically occurred at the bottom plate of an FSO.

Traditional Repair Challenges​

Typical steel renewal or repair involves hot work (welding), which brings major issues:

  • Requires gas freeing and tank cleaning
  • Full shutdown or offloading
  • Explosion risk in hydrocarbon environments
  • Long downtime and high cost

For an operating FSO, this is often impractical.

What is SPS Cold Work?

SPS (Steel Plate Strengthening) is a composite repair system using:

  • Polyurethane (PU elastomer)
  • Special adhesive 
  • Bonded directly between new top steel plate and onto existing steel

     

It creates a structural reinforcement layer without welding.

How SPS Solves Corrosion Issues (Without Hot Work)

  1. No hot work required
    SPS is installed using surface prep + bonding:
    • No welding sparks
    • No ignition risk
    • Can be done in hazardous zones (with proper controls)

This is the biggest advantage for FSOs!

  1. Minimal disruption to operations
    • Can often be applied while the tank remains in service or during short maintenance windows
    • No need for full tank decommissioning
    • No dry docking required

      This keeps production running!

  1. Structural reinforcement + corrosion barrier
    SPS does two things at once:

   a. Restores strength

      • Takes over part of the load from thinned steel
      • Compensates for corrosion loss

    b. Provides sealing

      • Isolates steel from water and corrosive agents
      • Stops further corrosion progression

  1. Works well for localized damage
    Ideal for:
    • Pitting corrosion
    • Bottom plate thinning
    • Small perforations (with backing)
    • Cracked or degraded areas

       

  1. Reduces need for steel replacement
    Instead of cutting and welding new plates:
    • Existing steel remains in place
    • SPS acts as a “bonded doubler”

  1. Faster installation
    Compared to steel renewal:
    • Less manpower
    • No heavy fabrication
    • Shorter repair cycles

Typical SPS Application Process

  1. Surface preparation (slurry blasting or mechanical cleaning)
  2. Inspection and thickness verification
  3. Adhesive application
  4. New Top panel placement
  5. Curing (often ambient or mildly accelerated)

     

No heat input, no structural distortion.

Limitations (important To Be Realistic)

SPS is not a universal fix:

  • Not suitable for severely wasted or buckled structures
  • Requires good surface preparation
  • Long-term performance depends on proper installation and QA/QC
  • Class approval is required (e.g., ABS, DNV, Lloyd’s)

Where SPS Is Especially Valuable On An FSO

  • Cargo tank bottom plates
  • Splash zones inside tanks
  • Bulkheads with localized thinning
  • Areas difficult to access for welding

Bottom Line

Corrosion in condensate FSOs is driven by aggressive chemistry, water presence, and operational stress—and traditional repairs are disruptive and risky.

SPS cold work offers a practical alternative by:

  • Eliminating hot work hazards
  • Allowing repairs during operation
  • Restoring structural integrity
  • Slowing or stopping further corrosion

Scenario (Realistic Case)

  • Asset: Condensate FSO 
  • Location of damage: Cargo tank bottom plating 
  • Extent: ~150 m² area with pitting + general corrosion (steel loss ~20–40%) 
  • Remaining life target: 5–10 years 
  • Constraint: Vessel must stay in operation (or minimize shutdown)

Option 1: Conventional Steel Replacement (Hot Work)

Execution steps

  1. Tank taken out of service 
  2. Gas freeing + cleaning (critical and time-consuming) 
  3. Scaffolding + access setup 
  4. Crop & renew steel plates 
  5. Welding, NDT, coating reinstatement 
  6. Recommissioning

Downtime impact

  • Affected including adjacent tanks outage: 5–8 weeks 
  • If it affects production/storage chain → can trigger: 
    • Reduced offtake capacity 
    • Shuttle tanker scheduling issues 
    • Potential production slowdown


Operational reality:
Even if only one tank is repaired, FSOs often lose flexibility → indirect production losses.

Cost Breakdown (Typical Offshore Range)

  • Steel fabrication & installation using diving & cofferdam: $3,500–$7,000/m² 
  • Coating reinstatement: $300–$800/m² 
  • Tank cleaning & gas freeing: $0.5M–$1.5M 
  • Offshore logistics (vessel support, manpower): $1M–$3M

     

👉 Total direct cost:
~$3M – $8M

👉 Indirect cost (production impact):
Can exceed $5M – $20M+, depending on oil price and downtime

Risks

  • 🔥 Hot work ignition risk (major hazard in condensate tanks) 
  • 🧪 Gas freeing may be incomplete → safety exposure 
  • Schedule overruns (very common offshore) 
  • 🔧 Welding defects / rework 
  • 🎯 Scope creep (once steel is opened up, more damage appears)

Option 2: SPS Cold Work (Bonded Composite Repair)

Execution steps

  1. Local isolation / controlled entry 
  2. Surface preparation (mechanical or slurry blasting) 
  3. Thickness verification 
  4. Adhesive + SPS panel installation 
  5. Ambient cure

No cutting, no welding.

Downtime Impact

  • Due to non-hot work presence, adjacent tanks can often remain: 
    • In service, OR 
    • Out for only a few days 

Typical duration:

  • Installation: 2–3 weeks 
  • No gas freeing required to the same extent as hot work

     

👉 Operational impact: minimal

Cost Breakdown (Typical Offshore Range)

  • SPS system supply & install: $1,500–$3,500/m² 
  • Surface prep & access: $200–$600/m² 
  • Manpower, QA/QC + SPS injections: Less than $1M

     

👉 Total direct cost:
~$0.5M – $2.5M

👉 Indirect cost:
Near zero (no major production interruption)

Risks

  • ⚠️ Surface prep quality is critical 
  • ⚠️ Requires trained applicators 
  • ⚠️ Not suitable for severely weakened structure

But:

  • No ignition risk 
  • No welding defects 
  • Minimal scope creep

Side-by-Side Comparison

Factor

Steel Replacement

SPS Cold Work

Hot work

Yes 🔥

No

Downtime

5–8 weeks

3-4 weeks

Production impact

High

Minimal

Direct cost

$3M–$8M

$0.5M–$2M

Indirect cost

Very high

Very low

Safety risk

High (explosion risk)

Low

Installation complexity

High

Moderate

Flexibility offshore

Low

High

Side-by-Side Comparison​

In actual FSO operations, the decision is rarely just about repair cost.

What really drives the choice:

  1. Production continuity
    Losing even a few days of production can outweigh the entire SPS project cost.

  1. Safety case
    Operators are increasingly avoiding hot work in hydrocarbon tanks unless absolutely necessary.

  1. Remaining life strategy
    • Steel replacement: best for long-term renewal (15–25 years) 
    • SPS: ideal for life extension (5–15 years)

       

  1. Logistics reality offshore
    Mobilizing welding teams, steel, and support vessels is:
    • Expensive 
    • Weather-dependent 
    • Schedule-sensitive
       

SPS is far easier to deploy.

Bottom Line

For a condensate FSO cargo tank:

  • If you need full structural renewal and long life → steel replacement 
  • If you need safe, fast, and cost-effective life extension → SPS cold work

In most real offshore cases today, operators choose SPS when:

  • Corrosion is moderate (not catastrophic) 
  • Shutdown is unacceptable 
  • Safety constraints are strict

Below picture showing prefabricated SPS panels ready for transportation to install on board.



Below picture showing SPS panels installed at the affected bottom plate.